Score
Benchmark
C
Influence
E
Score
License Index7.00
Business Index6.12
Risk Management Index8.90
Software Index8.08
Regulatory Index6.98
Benchmark
C
Influence
E
EPC · Legal aid B
Single Core
1G
40G
English
+61 2 8056 9475
More
Company Name
NAG Markets（Pacific）Limited
Company Abbreviation
NAG Markets
Platform registered country and region
Australia
Company website
YouTube
Company summary
Pyramid scheme complaint
Expose
WikiFX Data provide
Capital
$(USD)
It has been reduced by 20%.
There must be lowdown on NAG Markets . I couldn’t close position when it was a volatile market. After that, it fended off.
I want to report Zhu Kuilin, manager of NAG Markets, who withheld my commission. It even denied at first. Then he kept shirking with the excuse of insufficient fund. I have no idea. The following is chatting records. Having promised to refund me in May, he disappeared.
For example, for XAU/USD at 1728.5, when I enter a lot, it will inexplicably become 1728.55. When I am out, I will make a profit of 450, and when I am out, it will become 420. If it is occasional, it will be fine. It is every order, the entry and exit points are all A part of it is higher than the display. Over time, the loss is self-evident, too much, the platform feedback is also invalid, the operation is lost, not excessive, this kind of dark operation is really hateful
NAG Markets made my account liquidated and gave no access to withdrawal. It is simply a fraud.
Set the SL at 1822 but positions are closed at 1820 by the platform. And when the market fluctuated greatly, the market will lag. Fraud platform
My account 102625 opened an order in March and held it. The overnight interest was within $ 20/lot and increased to $35/lot without any notification. And it charged the inventory fee of $91/lot. The inventory fee was as high as $2,000 and the account was forced to liquidation. Please provide an explanation and make compensation.
In this early March, I began to trade on NAG Markets . During that time, due to the severe slippage, the order I pended at 1573 slipped to 1566, causing to losses. The platform responded that the gap was to blame. In addition, closing position was unpractical since the quotation had been closed, which didn’t happen on other platforms. Loss was caused by unavailable position closing or locking. The platform blamed on my mere fund. If it had no problem, I couldn’t have suffered such losses.
